In court judgements on nationality, it is common to find references to the constitutions and citizenship provisions of various countries. In addition, the influences of regional as well as global human rights legal instruments are often cited by lawyers in arguments and judges in their decisions. It is surprising, then, that academic scholarship on the topic is usually single‐country or single‐region specific in nature. In her new book The People in Question: Citizens and Constitutions in Uncertain Times, Jo Shaw decisively goes against this trend through critical engagement with a plethora of jurisdictions at various levels of national and international adjudication.

中文翻译：

---

《有问题的人：不确定时期的公民与宪法》（JOSHAW）（布里斯托尔：布里斯托尔大学出版社，2020年，336页，75.00英镑）

在法院关于国籍的判决中，通常会提到各国的宪法和公民身份规定。此外，律师经常在论据和法官的决定中引用区域和全球人权法律文书的影响。因此，令人惊讶的是，有关该主题的学术奖学金通常本质上是单个国家或单个区域的。萧萧（Jo Shaw）在她的新书《问题中的人们：不确定时期的公民与宪法》中，通过与国家和国际各级审判中的众多司法管辖区进行批判性接触，果断地与这一趋势背道而驰。