Many studies mention the social valorization of creative individuals. However, previous works show contrasting results concerning both this valorization and the links between creativity and the two dimensions of social judgment (individuals’ warmth and competence). Consequently, we implemented two paradigms classically used when examining the normative features of individuals' traits such as creativity. Study 1 (N = 206), using a self-presentation paradigm, showed that individuals tend to present themselves as creative in order to gain others' approval. Thus, creativity seems to be subject to social valorization. Studies 2 (N = 149) and 3 (N = 457), using social judgment tasks, corroborated these findings, and allowed to gain a finer-grained vision of what dimensions of social value are associated with creativity. These ones showed that highly creative individuals were considered warmer and more competent than weakly creative individuals. Results from Study 3 also suggest that these judgments may be domain-dependent. Implications for research on creativity, as well as on social judgment, are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

创造力的规范特征：创意个体被认为更温暖、更有能力

许多研究提到了创造性个体的社会价值化。然而，之前的作品显示了关于这种价值化以及创造力与社会判断的两个维度（个人的热情和能力）之间的联系的对比结果。因此，我们实施了在检查个人特征（例如创造力）的规范特征时经典使用的两种范式。研究 1 ( N  = 206) 使用自我展示范式，表明个人倾向于将自己展示为具有创造力的人，以获得他人的认可。因此，创造力似乎受制于社会价值化。研究 2 ( N  = 149) 和 3 ( N = 457），使用社会判断任务，证实了这些发现，并允许获得更细粒度的社会价值维度与创造力相关联的愿景。这些结果表明，富有创造力的人被认为比缺乏创造力的人更热情、更有能力。研究 3 的结果还表明，这些判断可能与领域有关。讨论了对创造力和社会判断研究的影响。