Past research has demonstrated that the hierarchical value structures of creative individuals differ systematically from their less creative counterparts. However, earlier studies used a global creativity score, which is inconsistent with both creativity’s movement toward a domain-specific viewpoint, and Lebedeva et al.’s 2019 study suggests the relationship between values and the frequency of creative behaviors differs by domain. We conducted two studies to determine if different creative domains are associated with distinct value hierarchies in creative ability, self-perception, and achievement. Study 1 (N = 156) examined whether Schwartz’s core values demonstrated a different pattern of correlations with verbal versus visual creative performance, assessed with story and drawing tasks. Study 2 (N = 492) examined the pattern of values across a broader set of domains (i.e., artistic, everyday/self, science, performance, and scholarly), assessed using measures of creative self-concept and self-reported creative achievement. The value hierarchies associated with each of the domains were not consistent with each other or with the findings of past studies. The implications of these results for creative domain specificity and motivation are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

跨创意领域的价值

过去的研究表明，有创造力的个人的等级价值结构与缺乏创造力的同行有系统的不同。然而，较早的研究使用了全局创造力评分，这与创造力朝着特定领域观点的运动不一致，Lebedeva 等人 2019 年的研究表明，价值观与创造性行为频率之间的关系因领域而异。我们进行了两项研究，以确定不同的创意领域是否与创造性能力、自我认知和成就方面的不同价值层次相关。研究 1 ( N  = 156) 检验了施瓦茨的核心价值观是否显示出与口头与视觉创造性表现的不同关联模式，并通过故事和绘画任务进行评估。研究 2 (N  = 492）研究了更广泛领域（即艺术、日常/自我、科学、表演和学术）的价值观模式，使用创造性自我概念和自我报告的创造性成就的措施进行评估。与每个领域相关的价值层次彼此不一致或与过去的研究结果不一致。讨论了这些结果对创造性领域特异性和动机的影响。