This article uses cases from disaster management as a springboard for presenting a critique of a right to group privacy in a strong sense. As such, the article challenges the idea of strong group privacy, which holds that there are situations in which the group, and not its members, is the holder of a right to privacy. The paper argues for a moderate interpretation of group privacy, stressing that group privacy is a matter of privacy for the members constituting the group. Although data‐driven knowledge discovery implies profiling by group categorization, this observation does not constitute a reason to introduce a right to group privacy for other purposes than to protect the individual's right to privacy. The article demonstrates preliminary theoretical considerations, which may inform the creation of a framework that protects personal privacy by considering a moderate sense of group privacy suited to tackle privacy challenges implied by data analytics.

中文翻译：

---

灾害管理案例说明对群体隐私的适度解释

本文以灾难管理案例为跳板，以强烈的眼光提出对群体隐私权的批评。因此，本文对强势群体隐私的概念提出了挑战，该观点认为，在某些情况下，该群体而不是其成员是隐私权的持有者。本文主张对群体隐私进行适度的解释，强调群体隐私是构成群体成员的隐私问题。尽管数据驱动的知识发现暗示了按群体分类进行分析，但此观察并不能构成出于保护个人隐私权以外的其他目的而引入群体隐私权的理由。本文展示了初步的理论考虑，