当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Law Journal  › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Better law‐making and the interinstitutional (dis)agreements: Some comments
European Law Journal  ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-27 , DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12364
María José Martínez Iglesias

This work argues that there is no univocal interpretation of what regulatory policy is and pursues. Taking the strategy of the European Commission as a starting point only, it addresses more specifically the Union legislature's perspective, which, in a democratic decision‐making process, cannot compromise its autonomy. In the unique constitutional universe of the European Union, the “Better Law‐Making” agenda pursues an important additional objective: facilitating the very process of adopting legislation by means of interinstitutional conflict prevention mechanisms and through a common approach to interpretation and implementation of primary law. That is the main purpose of the Interinstitutional Agreements on the quality of legislation, which place them in the position of a sort of soft constitutional law.

中文翻译:

更好的立法和机构间(分歧)协议:一些评论

这项工作认为,对什么是监管政策和追求什么没有明确的解释。它仅以欧洲委员会的战略为起点,更具体地说明了欧盟立法机关的观点,该观点在民主决策过程中不会损害其自治权。在欧洲联盟独特的宪法领域中,“制定更好的法律”议程追求一个重要的附加目标:通过机构间冲突预防机制以及通过对基本法的解释和执行的通用方法,为通过立法的整个过程提供便利。这是《机构间协定》关于立法质量的主要目的,这使它们处于某种软性的宪法上。
更新日期:2020-11-27
down
wechat
bug