当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Int. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Functionalism According to Paul Reuter: Playing a Lone Hand
European Journal of International Law ( IF 1.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-21 , DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chaa040
Evelyne Lagrange 1
Affiliation  

Abstract
The true designer of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) might have been a French professor of international law, Paul Reuter (1911–1990). Then working in the shadow of Jean Monnet, he became one of the leading experts in public international law in France from the late 1950s on and also served on the International Law Commission. It was not his style to develop a fully-fledged theory of functionalism, but he paid the utmost attention to the ‘functions’ of international organizations. While demonstrating a certain reluctance towards some consequences associated with functionalism, he expressed no disdain for a lite version of ‘constitutionalism’. Discretely, Reuter outlined a balancing between ‘functionalism’ and ‘constitutionalism’. He more insistently elaborated on the respective role of experts and policy-makers.


中文翻译:

保罗·路透(Paul Reuter)的功能主义:独行

摘要
欧洲煤炭和钢铁共同体(ECSC)高级机构的真正设计师可能是法国国际法教授保罗·路透(Paul Reuter,1911-1990年)。之后,他在让·莫内(Jean Monnet)的阴影下工作,从1950年代后期开始成为法国国际公法领域的领先专家之一,并曾在国际法委员会任职。发展成熟的功能主义理论不是他的风格,但他最大程度地关注了国际组织的“职能”。尽管他对功能主义带来的某些后果表现出某种不情愿的态度,但他对精简版的“宪政主义”表示不屑一顾。路透社谨慎地概述了“功能主义”与“宪政主义”之间的平衡。他更加坚持地阐述了专家和决策者的各自作用。
更新日期:2020-09-21
down
wechat
bug