This article seeks to illustrate the kinds of difficulties that may follow from renouncing a unified approach to restitutionary claims for unjust enrichment. To do so, it draws on the experience of the French legal system, where the notion of unjustified enrichment describes a maxim inspiring various doctrines which have evolved in relative isolation from each other. Relying on this experience, the article argues that the objections recently raised by Nils Jansen against the German law of unjustified enrichment should not lead English lawyers to downplay the value of a unified approach to the subject.

中文翻译：

---

不公正致富结构性辩论的另一种平民观点

本文试图说明放弃对不当得利的归还要求的统一方法可能带来的各种困难。为此，它借鉴了法国法律体系的经验，在该体系中，不当得利的概念描述了一个格言，该格言启发了在相对孤立的情况下发展起来的各种学说。基于这一经验，文章认为，尼尔斯·詹森最近对德国的不当得利法提出的反对意见不应导致英国律师淡化统一处理该主题的价值。