当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Psychoanalytic Dialogues
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Envy Considered Through Different Theoretical Perspectives: Reply to Bonovitz and Garvey
Psychoanalytic Dialogues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-15 , DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2020.1828781 Lynne Kwalwasser 1
中文翻译:
通过不同的理论视角来考虑嫉妒:回复Bonovitz和Garvey
更新日期:2020-12-23
Psychoanalytic Dialogues ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-15 , DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2020.1828781 Lynne Kwalwasser 1
Affiliation
I would like to thank Dr. Bonovitz and Mrs. Garvey for their thoughtful discussions of my paper (this issue). I appreciate that they approached my paper from different theoretical perspectives. Bonovitz presents his response within a Relational model while Garvey offers a Kleinian frame of reference. In response to Bonovitz’s critique, I address distinctions as they occur between primary and secondary envy. Garvey’s comments led me to explore differences between Kleinian and Relational theory and practice.
中文翻译:
通过不同的理论视角来考虑嫉妒:回复Bonovitz和Garvey
我要感谢Bonovitz博士和Garvey夫人对我的论文(本期)进行了周到的讨论。我很欣赏他们从不同的理论角度来研究我的论文。博诺维茨用关系模型展示了他的回答,而加维则提供了克莱因的参考框架。为了回应Bonovitz的批评,我谈到了主要嫉妒与次要嫉妒之间的区别。Garvey的评论使我探索了Kleinian与关系理论与实践之间的差异。