ABSTRACT

In “From Mediated Actions To Heterogenous Coalitions: Four Generations of Activity-Theoretical Studies of Work and Learning,” Engeström and Sannino discuss the fourth generation of activity theory as involving heterogeneous coalitions that are involved in intertwined learning cycles. They offer Change Laboratory interventions as a way to properly address learning in such coalitions. Here, I critically review this argument as offering a de facto public policy approach. I conclude by suggesting three ways to adapt Change Labs for this new scale of analysis.

中文翻译：

---

扩展变更实验室：对“从中介行动到异构联盟：四代活动的工作和学习理论研究”的回应

摘要

Engeström和Sannino在“从中介行动到异构联盟：四代活动-工作和学习的理论研究”中，讨论了第四代活动理论，涉及参与交错学习周期的异构联盟。他们提供了变革实验室的干预措施，作为正确解决此类联盟中学习问题的一种方式。在这里，我认真地评论了这种论点，认为它提供了事实上的公共政策方法。最后，我提出了三种方法来使Change Labs适应这种新的分析规模。