ABSTRACT

Leaning on a holistic supervising doctoral writing framework, this study sets out to conceptualise and unpack the dialogic feedback experiences sustained within a PhD candidate’s research article writing process. A juxtaposition of multiple data sources uncovers that effective employment of supervision approaches to feedback essentially varies across time and space, which is interlaced with student response dynamics, voices of academic community, supervisor professional experience, and dialogic mediums. The single interwoven narrative affords a nuanced understanding of the decision-making mechanism, practices, and relationship elements constituting supervisory feedback dialogues. It highlights the historically and socio-relationally shaped nature of personal agency through which individuals enact and interpret situation-specific feedback discourses.

摘要

依靠整体监督博士写作框架，本研究着手概念化和解开博士候选人研究文章写作过程中持续的对话反馈经验。多个数据源的并列显示，对反馈的监督方法的有效运用本质上是随时间和空间变化的，这与学生的反应动态、学术界的声音、监督者的专业经验和对话媒介交织在一起。单一交织的叙述提供了对构成监督反馈对话的决策机制、实践和关系元素的细致入微的理解。