当前位置: X-MOL 学术Behavioral Sciences & the Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Cognitive-affective drivers of fixation in threat assessment
Behavioral Sciences & the Law ( IF 1.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-19 , DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2486
J. Reid Meloy 1 , Tahir Rahman 2
Affiliation  

Pathological fixation – preoccupation with a person or a cause that is accompanied by deterioration in social and occupational functioning – has been found to precede most cases of targeted violence. It is clinically observed and theorized to have three different cognitive-affective drivers: delusion, obsession, or extreme overvalued belief. Each driver is explained, and case examples are provided in the context of threat assessment. Extreme overvalued belief as a new concept is discussed in detail, both its historical provenance and its demarcation from delusions and obsessions. Threat management for each separate cognitive-affective driver is briefly summarized, based upon current clinical findings and research. Emphasis is placed upon understanding both the categorical and dimensional nature (intensity) of these cognitive-affective drivers, and suggested guidelines are offered for the assessment of such in a clinical examination by a forensic psychiatrist or psychologist.

中文翻译:

威胁评估中认知的认知驱动因素

人们发现,在大多数有针对性的暴力事件发生之前,病理性固定(即对某个人或某种原因的偏爱,同时伴随着社会和职业功能的恶化)。临床上已观察到并理论认为它具有三种不同的认知情感驱动力:妄想,痴迷或极端高估的信念。对每个驾驶员进行了说明,并在威胁评估的背景下提供了案例。详细讨论了极端高估的信念作为一个新概念,包括其历史渊源以及对妄想和痴迷的划分。根据当前的临床发现和研究,对每个单独的认知情感驱动程序的威胁管理进行了简要总结。重点在于理解这些认知影响因素的类别和维度性质(强度),
更新日期:2020-10-19
down
wechat
bug