Should businesses be allowed to deny services based on their strongly held religious beliefs? Despite the recent Supreme Court Case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado, this question of the right to discriminate remains unanswered. Given the currently ambiguous legal area, it is important to understand whether the public supports these laws. The current study examines both general support for the law and under what conditions people support it. The service provided and the religion of the service provider were both manipulated while religiosity and system justification were examined as potential moderators. Service type was the only significant experimental predictor of support, with participants less supportive of the law when reading about a marriage certificate being denied due to religious reasons than a wedding cake and a wedding ceremony being denied. Religiosity, but not system justification, moderated the relationship between service type and support for the law.

中文翻译：

---

让他们吃蛋糕？对歧视法律的宗教权利的支持背景化

是否应该允许企业基于其强烈的宗教信仰而拒绝提供服务？尽管最近最高法院的杰作蛋糕店诉科罗拉多案，这个歧视权问题仍然没有答案。鉴于目前的法律领域模棱两可，了解公众是否支持这些法律非常重要。目前的研究考察了对法律的普遍支持以及人们在什么条件下支持它。所提供的服务和服务提供者的宗教信仰都被操纵，而宗教信仰和系统正当性则被视为潜在的调节者。服务类型是唯一重要的实验性支持预测指标，参与者在阅读有关因宗教原因拒绝结婚证书而不是结婚蛋糕和婚礼被拒绝时对法律的支持程度较低。宗教信仰，而不是系统的正当性，调节了服务类型和对法律的支持之间的关系。