convincingly demonstrates how both OND and OED are reciprocally related to the cultural, political and social identity of the Israeli state. Chapter 6 sums up the central findings and – through a reading of Hegel – suggests a possible alternative to the fixed and stagnated discourses that currently characterise status quo, that is, a more ecological discourse that might be able to transcend the discourses of estrangement and normalisation. With this volume Friedman and Gavriely-Nuri provide an original theoretical contribution to the field of Discourse Analysis, convincingly showing how occupation normalisation and estrangement discourses progress dialectically; how they feed of each other by challenging, redefining and incorporating elements from each other. Exactly therein lies the core of the book’s theoretical argument, namely that the very nature of social conflict discourse is dialectic. As each side of the conflict attempts to enlist a set of values in order to serve its ends, each part of the conflict not only seeks to distance the other from these values, but it constitutes its own identity through the negation of the other. By synthesising seminal work from CDA and adding to it a dialectic element, this important theoretical contribution brings with it a set of new and expanded analytical tools, whose utility the authors prove by the original and insightful conclusions they are able to draw from the empirical analysis. This theoretical and methodological contribution to the field of discourse analysis is promising for developing the field and for the possibility of understanding prolonged, intractable identity conflicts between social groups. Because this framework is developed though an analysis of Israeli discourse, future research that take a DDA approach could possibly test how this framework is apt for studying conflict within groups. Applying DDA as a framework for analysing social group fragmentation and related notions such as ‘deviants’, ‘apostates’, ‘traitors’, and ‘heretics’, might yield new insights into how dialectic processes work internally within social groups. In light of the original theoretical and methodological contribution Friedman and Gavriely-Nuri offers, this volume is a must-read for experienced discourse analysts as well as scholars interested in social group conflict.

中文翻译：

---

书评：Matteo Farina，Facebook 和对话分析：评论线程的结构和组织

令人信服地展示了 OND 和 OED 如何与以色列国家的文化、政治和社会身份相互关联。第 6 章总结了核心发现，并通过阅读黑格尔提出了一种可能替代目前表征现状的固定和停滞话语的可能替代方案，即一种更生态的话语，它可能能够超越疏远和正常化的话语. Friedman 和 Gavriely-Nuri 在这本书中为话语分析领域提供了独创的理论贡献，令人信服地展示了职业规范化和疏远话语如何辩证地发展；他们如何通过挑战、重新定义和合并彼此的元素来相互补充。这正是本书理论论证的核心所在，即社会冲突话语的本质是辩证的。当冲突的每一方都试图征集一套价值观以服务于其目的时，冲突的每一部分不仅试图将对方与这些价值观拉开距离，而且还通过对对方的否定来构成自己的身份。通过综合 CDA 的开创性工作并为其添加辩证法元素，这一重要的理论贡献带来了一套新的和扩展的分析工具，作者通过他们能够从实证分析中得出的原始和有见地的结论证明了其效用. 这种对话语分析领域的理论和方法论贡献有望促进该领域的发展以及理解社会群体之间长期、棘手的身份冲突的可能性。由于该框架是通过对以色列话语的分析而开发的，因此采用 DDA 方法的未来研究可能会测试该框架如何适用于研究群体内的冲突。将 DDA 作为分析社会群体分裂和相关概念（例如“越轨者”、“叛教者”、“叛徒”和“异端”）的框架，可能会对辩证过程如何在社会群体内部发挥作用产生新的见解。鉴于 Friedman 和 Gavriely-Nuri 提供的原始理论和方法论贡献，本书是经验丰富的话语分析师以及对社会群体冲突感兴趣的学者的必读之书。将 DDA 作为分析社会群体分裂和相关概念（如“越轨者”、“叛教者”、“叛徒”和“异端”）的框架，可能会对辩证过程如何在社会群体内部发挥作用产生新的见解。鉴于 Friedman 和 Gavriely-Nuri 提供的原始理论和方法论贡献，本书是经验丰富的话语分析师以及对社会群体冲突感兴趣的学者的必读之书。将 DDA 作为分析社会群体分裂和相关概念（如“越轨者”、“叛教者”、“叛徒”和“异端”）的框架，可能会对辩证过程如何在社会群体内部发挥作用产生新的见解。鉴于 Friedman 和 Gavriely-Nuri 提供的原始理论和方法论贡献，本书是经验丰富的话语分析师以及对社会群体冲突感兴趣的学者的必读之书。