Abstract As the use of intersectionality continues to increase in psychology, so do the critiques and extensions of it. Scholars and practitioners who want to integrate intersectionality need to navigate these critiques to maximize its effectiveness and minimize its potential pitfalls. We examine critiques and extensions of intersectionality, particularly as they apply to mental health theory and practice. We focus on two particular cases, namely assemblage theory and decolonial intersectionality, to discuss ways in which extensions of intersectionality can promote a broader, more inclusive model of intersectional social justice and well-being.

中文翻译：

---

导航对交叉方法的批评：为全球社会正义和福祉恢复交叉性

摘要 随着交叉性在心理学中的使用不断增加，对其的批评和扩展也在增加。想要整合交叉性的学者和从业者需要驾驭这些批评，以最大限度地提高其有效性并最大限度地减少其潜在的陷阱。我们研究了对交叉性的批评和扩展，特别是当它们适用于心理健康理论和实践时。我们关注两个特定案例，即组合理论和非殖民交叉性，以讨论交叉性的扩展可以促进更广泛、更具包容性的交叉社会正义和福祉模型的方式。