Abstract

The established view is that the Stockholm-School economist Erik Lundberg was a tenacious opponent of the so-called Rehn-Meidner model, an economic and wage policy program developed by two Swedish trade-union economists after WW II. But despite his ideological objections, Lundberg shared many of the premises of the model in his debate with Gösta Rehn in the early 1950s. Furthermore, in their debate, Lundberg approached Rehn’s policy program and macroeconomic theory. Lundberg’s ambiguous attitude turned into a complete adoption of the Rehn-Meidner model in the 1960s. By highlighting the model’s originality, Lundberg also correctly downplayed the impact of the Stockholm School.

摘要

公认的观点是，斯德哥尔摩学派经济学家埃里克·伦德伯格 (Erik Lundberg) 是所谓的 Rehn-Meidner 模型的顽强反对者，该模型是二战后由两位瑞典工会经济学家制定的经济和工资政策计划。但尽管有意识形态上的反对，伦德伯格在 1950 年代初期与 Gösta Rehn 的辩论中分享了该模型的许多前提。此外，在他们的辩论中，伦德伯格接近了雷恩的政策计划和宏观经济理论。伦德伯格模棱两可的态度变成了 1960 年代对 Rehn-Meidner 模型的完全采用。通过强调模型的独创性，伦德伯格也正确地淡化了斯德哥尔摩学派的影响。