This article examines the ways in which the negotiation framework—i.e., the legal guarantees, information management mechanism, and degree of inclusivity in peace negotiations—shapes the likelihood of concluding a peace agreement. Codifying the peace negotiations in law, publicizing information about the content of negotiations, and including mediators and civil society actors in peace talks is likely to increase a government's short‐term costs. However, doing so alleviates the adversaries' information asymmetry and commitment problems, sets guidelines to insure the process against exogenous shocks, and increases the number of actors taking part in conflict management. Comparing the recent peace negotiations to end intrastate wars in Colombia and Turkey, this article argues that a legalized, public, and inclusive framework made a peace agreement possible in Colombia, while the lack of such a framework caused Turkey's peace talks to fail.

中文翻译：

---

和平谈判为什么成功或失败？哥伦比亚（2012-2016年）和土耳其（2012-2015年）和平谈判期间的法律承诺，透明度和包容性

本文探讨了谈判框架（即法律保障，信息管理机制和和平谈判的包容程度）如何塑造达成和平协议的可能性。将和平谈判定为法律，公开有关谈判内容的信息，并将调解员和民间社会行为体纳入和平谈判，可能会增加政府的短期成本。但是，这样做可以减轻对手的信息不对称和承诺问题，制定指导方针以确保流程免受外来冲击，并增加参与冲突管理的参与者数量。比较最近的和平谈判以结束在哥伦比亚和土耳其的州内战争，本文认为，合法，公开，