In their constructive reviews, Frances Egan, Randy Gallistel and Steven Gross have raised some important problems for the account of content advanced by Nicholas Shea in Representation in Cognitive Science (2018, OUP). Here the author addresses their main challenges as follows. Egan argues that the account includes an unrecognised pragmatic element; and that it makes contents explanatorily otiose. Gallistel raises questions about homomorphism and correlational information. Gross puts the account to work to resolve the dispute about probabilistic contents in perception, but argues that a question remains about whether probabilities are found in the content or instead in the manner of representation.

中文翻译：

---

认知科学中的表征：答复

在他们的建设性评论中，Frances Egan、Randy Gallistel 和 Steven Gross 为 Nicholas Shea 在 Representation in Cognitive Science (2018, OUP) 中提出的内容提出了一些重要问题。在这里，作者解决了他们的主要挑战如下。伊根认为，该帐户包含了一个未被承认的实用元素；并且它使内容在解释上变得乏味。Gallistel 提出了关于同态和相关信息的问题。Gross 将这个帐户用于解决关于感知中概率内容的争议，但认为仍然存在一个问题，即概率是在内容中还是在表示方式中找到。