Qualitative interviews with one hundred defendants in Dutch criminal cases examine whether perceived procedural justice is a relevant concern for defendants, and, if so, which procedural justice components they refer to. The study provides a point of epistemological departure from the quantitative studies dominating the field, as it assessed which components of procedural justice (if any) respondents put forward themselves rather than asking about predetermined procedural justice components. The large majority of respondents mentioned procedural justice issues themselves, and six components were at the core of their procedural justice perceptions: (1) information on which decisions are based, (2) interpersonal treatment, (3) due consideration, (4) neutrality, (5) voice, and (6) accuracy. Although these procedural justice components largely correspond with the literature, respondents thus mentioned some components more often, and others less often, than the literature would suggest. In particular, neutrality plays an important role in the Dutch legal context examined here.

中文翻译：

---

说到正义：对荷兰刑事案件中被告人所知程序性正义的质性访谈研究

在荷兰刑事案件中，对一百名被告进行了定性访谈，考察了被视为程序上的公正是否与被告有关，如果是，则涉及哪些程序上的公正。该研究提供了认识论与主导该领域的定量研究的认识论背离，因为它评估了受访者提出的程序正义（如果有）的哪些组成部分，而不是询问预定的程序正义组成部分。绝大多数受访者自己提到了程序正义问题，并且六个组成部分是他们对程序正义的看法的核心：（1）决策依据，（2）人际关系，（3）适当考虑，（4）中立，（5）语音和（6）准确性。尽管这些程序正义要素在很大程度上与文献相符，但受访者因此提到的某些要素比文献所建议的要多，而较少。特别是，中立性在这里考察的荷兰法律环境中起着重要作用。