We investigate cause lawyers’ roles in movements for the domestic adoption of international human rights norms. Social movements scholarship often assumes that lawyers will divert activism toward institutional tactics, while the sociolegal studies literature emphasizes that lawyers are active in diverse ways across venues. A paired comparison of antidiscrimination movements in South Korea and Japan reveals how critical junctures in regime history shape the tactical repertoires that cause lawyers bring to their interactions with movement actors, and thus also movement tactics. This research advances scholarship on professionals in social movements, cause lawyers as norm entrepreneurs, and legal mobilization in East Asia.

中文翻译：

---

原因律师和运动策略：韩国和日本的残疾人权利运动

我们调查诉讼律师在国内采纳国际人权准则的运动中的作用。社会运动奖学金经常假设律师会将激进主义转移到制度策略上，而社会法律研究文献则强调律师在各个场所都以多种方式活跃。在韩国和日本进行的反歧视运动的成对比较表明，政权历史上的关键关头如何塑造战术库，导致律师与运动参与者进行互动，从而也使运动策略产生影响。这项研究提高了对社会运动专业人士的奖学金，促使律师成为规范企业家，并在东亚进行了法律动员。