In this commentary, the author offers three related perspectives regarding (in)securitization: first, an overview of ongoing discussions taking place among US‐based ethnographers of colour about the effects of surveillance on ethnography; second, an example of the impact that (in)securitization may have on the researcher/researched relationship in contemporary ethnographic research; and third, an extension of Garfinkel’s notion of the “breach” within the current sociopolitical context. Throughout this essay, the author calls for a greater sense of connection to and solidarity with those “vulnerable subjects” that we engage with ethnographically.

中文翻译：

---

体现违规行为：在美国的（未）证券化和人种学参与

在这篇评论中，作者提供了关于（在）安全化方面的三个相关观点：首先，概述了美国有色人种志研究人员正在进行的关于监视对人种志影响的讨论；第二，一个实例说明（在）证券化可能对当代人种学研究中的研究者/被研究关系带来的影响；第三，在当前的社会政治背景下，加芬克尔（Garfinkel）的“违约”概念得到了扩展。在整篇文章中，作者呼吁对与人种学有关的那些“弱势主体”有更大的联系和团结感。