This paper brings the thought of philosopher and world‐class chemist Michael Polanyi to bear on psychologists' study of honor cultures. After reviewing some fundamentals of Polanyi's outlook on science and persons, the paper develops a heuristic involving two dimensions to the process of knowing others—one that is integrative, another that is affective—in which seeing with honor cultures only characterizes one side of the intersection between these dimensions. This leads on to consideration of the Honor Ideology for Manhood scale (Barnes, Brown, & Osterman, 2012), an operationalization of honor in the southern U.S. that misses understanding because of impairments it naturally suffers as an instrument of detachment. The possibility follows that understanding as seeing with another culture most readily succeeds when that culture's way of life is personally indwelt so that the psychologist directly encounters what its members can speak of and only convey by showing. The distinction Polanyi makes between explicit and tacit knowledge informs this proposal, and his vision of apprenticing—such as occurs between masters and pupils in the training of a science or an art—is presented as an exemplary form of such encounters.

中文翻译：

---

心理学家在实践荣誉文化时是否了解它们？

本文将哲学家和世界级化学家迈克尔·波兰尼的思想带入了心理学家对荣誉文化的研究。在回顾了波兰尼关于科学和人的观点的一些基础知识之后，本文提出了一种启发式方法，涉及到认识他人的过程的两个维度—一个是综合的，另一个是情感的—在其中，以荣誉文化的眼光只能说明交集的一面。在这些尺寸之间。这导致人们考虑了“成年荣誉意识形态”量表（Barnes，Brown和Osterman，2012），这是在美国南部进行的荣誉运营，由于其作为支队工具而遭受的损害而缺乏理解。可能性遵循理解为与看当一种文化亲自生活在另一种文化中时，另一种文化最容易成功，从而使心理学家直接遇到其成员可以说的话，并且只能通过展示来传达。波兰尼在显性知识和隐性知识之间的区别为该建议提供了依据，他对学徒的见解（例如在科学或艺术培训中大师和学生之间的见解）被作为此类相遇的一种典型形式。