John Searle has mistakenly claimed that emergence is the central concept in the account of social ontology defended by Tony Lawson, the central figure in the project now regularly referred to as Cambridge Social Ontology. This is not the case. Rather, if any concept can be considered central for Lawson, it is organisation. In this paper, I explain how Searle could misunderstand Lawson and, in doing so, I bring out the importance of organisation for understanding how phenomena, both social and non‐social, are constituted.

中文翻译：

---

组织，出现和剑桥社会本体论

约翰·塞尔（John Searle）错误地宣称，出现是托尼·劳森（Tony Lawson）辩护的社会本体论的中心概念，托尼·劳森（Tony Lawson）是该项目的中心人物，现在经常被称为剑桥社会本体论。不是这种情况。相反，如果可以将任何概念视为Lawson的核心，那就是组织。在本文中，我解释了塞尔如何误解劳森，并因此而提出组织对于理解社会现象和非社会现象是如何构成的重要性。