The performance of the courts has been at the center of both political and public debates around the world and is one of the success indicators in the development of public policies on access to law and justice, particularly as regards the right to obtain a decision in reasonable time. The introduction of new information and communication technologies has been essential in extending this access to law and justice in two ways: as a way of making courts function more efficiently; and as an instrument for measuring and assessing the level of compliance with established policy objectives. Anchored in this “computerization of justice” movement, we intend to analyze its role in the overall performance of the courts in an important and central area for the economy and the functioning of the markets: corporate insolvency and restructuring. In order to achieve this purpose, a series of interviews was carried out with several key judicial players and stakeholders. What has been found in this research shows that day‐to‐day reality is not yet fully in line with policy purposes and legal provisions. Technologies still play an ambivalent role: despite streamlining processes, they raise new difficulties and challenges that require constant improvements.

中文翻译：

---

数字时代的法院绩效：破产和重组程序案例

法院的表现一直是世界范围内政治和公共辩论的中心，并且是制定有关诉诸法律和司法的公共政策（尤其是在合理的情况下获得裁决的权利方面）成功指标之一。时间。引入新的信息和通信技术对于以两种方式扩大获得法律和司法的机会至关重要：这是使法院更有效地运作的一种方式；以及作为衡量和评估对既定政策目标的遵守程度的工具。在这种“正义的计算机化”运动中，我们打算分析其在经济和市场功能（企业破产和重组）这一重要而核心的法院的整体绩效中的作用。为了达到这个目的，与几个主要的司法人员和利益相关者进行了一系列的访谈。这项研究发现，日常现实尚未完全符合政策目的和法律规定。技术仍然扮演着矛盾的角色：尽管简化了流程，但它们带来了新的困难和挑战，需要不断改进。