The legislation of the European Union has addressed the private international law aspects of civil and commercial matters and those of insolvency cases separately. While the Brussels Ibis Regulation (and its predecessors) focuses on “classic” civil of commercial cases, insolvency proceedings are subject to the (recast) Insolvency Regulation. However, the close interference between the two related areas of law—commercial and insolvency—results in a category of cases that are commercial and contentious in nature, and so they would tend to gravitate towards the Brussels regime, but yet they are so closely connected to the insolvency proceedings that justifies a special approach. This article focuses on the question of international jurisdiction regarding these “annex actions” in the context of the EU law. It will attempt to explore the historical roots of the current provisions and the evolution of both the European legislation and the relevant case law. The examination of this progression provides a better understanding of the current legislation and answers some questions apparently left open in the recast Insolvency Regulation.

中文翻译：

---

有关破产和布鲁塞尔宜必思法规中附件行动的管辖权

欧洲联盟的立法已分别处理民法和商事事项以及破产案件的国际私法问题。虽然布鲁塞尔我二该法规（及其前身）侧重于“经典”民事案件，破产程序受制于（重塑）破产法规。但是，商业和破产这两个相关法律领域之间的密切干涉导致了性质上属于商业性和争议性的一类案件，因此它们倾向于被布鲁塞尔政权所吸引，但它们之间却息息相关破产程序中采用特殊方法的理由。本文重点关注欧盟法律范围内关于这些“附件行动”的国际管辖权问题。它将尝试探索当前条款的历史渊源以及欧洲立法和相关判例法的演变。