As climate change impacts become increasingly apparent, adaptation becomes increasingly urgent. Accordingly, adaptation to climate change has shifted towards the centre of attention in both policy and research. In this article, we review the last 10 years of adaptation research (2008–2018), with a focus on work within the Earth System Governance network. We use the lens of access and allocation to structure our review and examine how adaptation affects, and is affected by, access to basic needs, basic rights, and decision-making on the one hand, as well as allocation of responsibilities, resources, and risks on the other. We find that questions of justice, equity, and fairness are fundamental to all dimensions of adaptation. The access perspective, for example, suggests that we need to assess vulnerability, understood broadly, while the allocation perspective focuses on questions of responsibility for being vulnerable, e.g. when people live, or move to, hazard-prone areas exposed to climate risk. This also relates to questions of who is responsible for selecting, implementing, and funding adaptation measures. Overall, we find that the framework of “access and allocation” and its subcategories offer a detailed approach to adaptation and adaptation research, but that it is not intuitive. The notion of “climate justice” seems to resonate more with both academic and policy debates.

中文翻译：

---

气候变化适应中的获取和分配

随着气候变化的影响越来越明显，适应变得越来越紧迫。因此，适应气候变化已经转移到政策和研究的关注中心。在本文中，我们回顾了过去 10 年（2008-2018 年）的适应研究，重点关注地球系统治理网络内的工作。我们使用获取和分配的视角来构建我们的审查，并检查适应如何影响，一方面是获取基本需求、基本权利和决策，以及责任、资源和资源的分配，并受其影响。另一方面的风险。我们发现正义、公平和公平问题对于适应的所有方面都至关重要。例如，访问角度表明我们需要评估脆弱性，广泛理解，而分配视角则侧重于脆弱性的责任问题，例如人们何时居住或迁移到易受气候风险影响的灾害易发地区。这也涉及谁负责选择、实施和资助适应措施的问题。总体而言，我们发现“获取和分配”框架及其子类别为适应和适应研究提供了详细的方法，但并不直观。“气候正义”的概念似乎更能引起学术和政策辩论的共鸣。我们发现“获取和分配”的框架及其子类别为适应和适应研究提供了详细的方法，但并不直观。“气候正义”的概念似乎更能引起学术和政策辩论的共鸣。我们发现“获取和分配”的框架及其子类别为适应和适应研究提供了详细的方法，但并不直观。“气候正义”的概念似乎更能引起学术和政策辩论的共鸣。