Science is undergoing a crisis that has been referred to, since the early 21st century, as a crisis of confidence and a crisis of replication. This article reviews questions pertaining to the replication crisis; questions addressing the quality and credibility of the sciences; specifically, questions linked to what are known as false positives, null results, and questionable research practices (p‐hacking, harking, cherry‐picking). As an outcome of our review and analysis, a set of recommendations to strengthen the elaboration of reliable and valid research studies is provided. Changes are needed in order to foment meta‐research, open science practices and replication studies; notably, changes are needed in the instruction of research methods; in the use and interpretation of statistical data, as well as in research culture in general. We conclude that the replication crisis presents an opportunity to improve research practices and the quality of scientific production in all fields of research, including research in education.

中文翻译：

---

复制危机还是提高科学生产的机会？

自21世纪初以来，科学正经历着一种危机，即信任危机和复制危机。本文回顾了与复制危机有关的问题；有关科学质量和信誉的问题；具体来说，与所谓的误报，无效结果和可疑的研究实践（p-hacking，harking，cherry-picking）相关的问题。作为我们审查和分析的结果，提供了一组建议，以加强对可靠和有效研究的阐述。为了推动元研究，开放科学实践和复制研究，需要做出改变。值得注意的是，研究方法的指导需要改变；统计数据的使用和解释，以及一般的研究文化。