Sketching while narrating is effective for eliciting information and veracity cues in single interviews. In the current research, we tested this technique in multiple interviews. Participants were interviewed three times over three weeks about a genuine (truth tellers) or a fabricated (lie tellers) memorable event. They sketched while narrating in Week 1, Week 2, Weeks 1 and 2, or not at all (verbal statement only). Statements were coded for total, core, peripheral, and common knowledge details, self-handicapping strategies, complications, plausibility, and proportions of complications and core details. In the third interview and across interviews, the Sketch instruction resulted in a higher proportion of core details. Truth tellers reported more total and core details and complications and fewer common knowledge details and exhibited a higher proportion of complications than lie tellers. Truth tellers' stories also sounded more plausible than lie tellers' stories. The interaction effects were not significant. Thus, sketching while narrating seemed to have a similar effect on truth tellers and lie tellers in the current study.

叙述时草绘可有效地在单次采访中获得信息和准确性提示。在当前的研究中，我们在多次采访中测试了该技术。在三个星期内，对参与者进行了一次关于一次真正的（真相算命者）或一个虚假的（说谎的算命者）值得纪念的事件的采访。他们在第1周，第2周，第1周和第2周进行叙述时作了素描，或者根本不作（仅口头陈述）。陈述的编码方式包括总知识，核心知识，外围知识和常识细节，自我障碍策略，并发症，合理性以及并发症和核心细节的比例。在第三次面试中以及在所有面试中，Sketch指令所占核心细节的比例更高。真相算命者报告的总的和核心的细节以及并发症的发生率更高，而常识细节却更少，并且所显示的并发症的比例高于说谎者。真相出纳者的故事听起来也比撒谎者更合理。相互作用的影响不明显。因此，在叙述中进行素描时，在当前的研究中似乎对真相和说谎者具有相似的影响。