Domestic courts enjoy generous attention in international political and legal climate change literature. As a result of the reluctance of national governments to pursue climate protection measures, courts are called on to enforce international climate goals. This article assesses two domestic climate change cases (the Thabametsi Case and the Vienna Airport Case) in the light of Anthea Roberts’ functional understanding of the role of domestic courts in international law. It argues that domestic courts play a pivotal role in linking international obligations of conduct with national obligations of result. This role depends on domestic contexts and, therefore, requires a comparative approach.

中文翻译：

---

国内法院和《巴黎协定》的气候目标：比较方法的必要性

国内法院在国际政治和法律气候变化文献中享有盛誉。由于各国政府不愿采取气候保护措施，法院被要求执行国际气候目标。本文评估了两个国内气候变化案例（塔巴梅齐案和维也纳机场案例) 根据安西娅·罗伯茨对国内法院在国际法中的作用的功能性理解。它认为，国内法院在将国际行为义务与国家结果义务联系起来方面发挥着关键作用。这一作用取决于国内情况，因此需要比较方法。