We exploit variations in access rules on the European Court of Justice to explore the effect of procedural inclusiveness on the agenda of international adjudicators. Using natural language processing methods, we analyze the entire universe of ECJ decisions up to 2015, mapping issue prevalence across time, procedure and litigant type. We find evidence that the more inclusive annulment and referral procedures are associated with greater issue heterogeneity whereas less inclusive infringement procedure displays greater issue cohesiveness as well as greater issue stability over time.

中文翻译：

---

对国际法院的关注：来自欧洲法院的证据

我们利用欧洲法院准入规则的变化来探讨程序包容性对国际仲裁员议程的影响。使用自然语言处理方法，我们分析了截至 2015 年的整个欧洲法院判决范围，映射了跨时间、程序和诉讼当事人类型的问题普遍性。我们发现证据表明，更具包容性的撤销和转介程序与更大的问题异质性相关，而包容性较低的侵权程序则显示出更大的问题凝聚力以及随着时间的推移更大的问题稳定性。