We conducted a descriptive analysis of single-case research design (SCRD) studies on safety skills instruction (SSI) for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Once we identified studies through electronic databases and reference lists, we used What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Standards to evaluate each study. We analyzed studies in terms of various descriptive variables, calculated effect sizes through improvement rate difference (IRD), and aggregated effect sizes across studies to produce an omnibus effect size. Results showed 18 of 29 studies met the WWC Standards to meet design standards (MS) and meet design standards with reservations (MS-R), and various types of SSI were effective in teaching various skills. Of 18, 12 studies resulted in a large effect, and we found a behavioral skills training package (BST) to be evidence-based when we applied a 5-3-20 rule. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.

我们对自闭症谱系障碍（ASD）个人的安全技能指导（SSI）的单案研究设计（SCRD）研究进行了描述性分析。一旦我们通过电子数据库和参考列表确定了研究，便使用了What Works Clearinghouse（WWC）标准来评估每项研究。我们分析了各种描述性变量，通过改善率差（IRD）计算的效应量以及整个研究的综合效应量以产生综合效应量的研究。结果表明，在29项研究中，有18项符合WWC标准以达到设计标准（MS）并保留设计标准（MS-R）和各种SSI可以有效地教授各种技能。在18项研究中，有12项研究产生了很大的效果，当我们应用5-3-20规则时，我们发现行为技能培训包（BST）是基于证据的。讨论了对研究人员和从业人员的影响。