Many universities use lecture capture to record live lectures and make them available online, although this practice is not without controversy. We used an online survey to investigate perceptions of lectures and their capture in staff (N = 95) and students (N = 522). We found that they valued lectures and perceived capture differently, despite similar views on the type of learning lectures best support. Students were more positive about capture, utilising the online platform effectively. Exact use differed depending on whether students were substituting or supplementing attendance. Use of lecture capture was predicted by several factors including: demand of live lectures, attendance, and performance. Student attendance ratings were predicted by the availability of online resources and difficulty in getting to lectures, whilst staff felt only availability of online resources was critical in determining student attendance. Differing views of lectures and the importance of attendance may contribute to the different overall perceptions of lecture capture in these two groups.

尽管这种做法并非没有争议，但许多大学都使用演讲捕获来记录现场演讲并在线提供。我们使用了一项在线调查来调查对演讲的看法及其对工作人员（N  = 95）和学生（N = 522）。我们发现，尽管对学习讲座的类型有最佳支持，但他们对讲座的重视程度和对捕获的看法有所不同。学生对捕捉更为积极，可以有效地利用在线平台。确切的用途因学生是替代还是补充出勤而有所不同。演讲捕获的使用通过几个因素进行了预测，包括：现场演讲的需求，出勤率和表演。通过在线资源的可用性和上课的难度来预测学生出勤率，而工作人员则认为只有在线资源的可用性对确定学生出勤率至关重要。演讲的不同观点和出席的重要性可能会导致这两个群体对演讲捕捉的整体看法不同。