IF no substitute is negotiated for the Brussels Recast Regulation (1215/2012) on “Brexit”, the provisions in the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR) for permission to serve claims out of the jurisdiction may assume a greater significance in future cross-border litigation. So the timing of the Supreme Court's decision in Four Seasons Holding Inc. v Brownlie [2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 W.L.R. 192 is apposite.

中文翻译：

---

CPR 中的司法门户

如果没有就“英国脱欧”的布鲁塞尔重铸条例 (1215/2012) 谈判没有替代品，则 1998 年民事诉讼规则 (CPR) 中关于允许在管辖范围外送达索赔的规定可能在未来的跨境交易中具有更大的意义诉讼。所以最高法院在四季控股公司诉布朗利[2017] UKSC 80, [2018] 1 WLR 192 是合适的。