当前位置: X-MOL 学术Aust. Educ. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Strangers on a train: the politics of collaboration
The Australian Educational Researcher ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-01 , DOI: 10.1007/s13384-020-00386-9
Margaret Baguley , Martin Kerby , Abbey MacDonald , Vaughan Cruickshank

This article explores the experience of three research teams operating across a variety of educational contexts. As members of these teams, the authors were privy to a range of opportunities and challenges that emphasised how political collaboration can be, even when the team formation is an outgrowth of previous personal and professional relationships. There are a range of inhibitors and enablers that impact on the success of a collaborative team, which can be further exacerbated by increasingly performative requirements and expectations in the university sector. In response, university academics seek collaborative opportunities in order to enhance research productivity and to establish networks capable of attracting competitive grant funding. However, little attention has been given to the experiences, attitudes and values of research team members, particularly those undertaking leadership responsibilities. Using the premise of Hitchcock’s (Strangers on a train [Motion picture], Warner Brothers, Hollywood, 1951) film noir Strangers on a Train as a metaphoric device, three collaborative teams are investigated using a narrative approach. The narrative account draws upon the authors’ reflections of their participation in the teams which are fused in a single imaginative vignette in order to identify the key factors that contributed to the success or demise of the teams. The findings revealed the critical importance of established relationships, clear vision and communication, and institutional rewards.

中文翻译:

火车上的陌生人:合作的政治

本文探讨了三个研究团队在各种教育环境中运作的经验。作为这些团队的成员,作者了解了一系列机遇和挑战,这些机遇和挑战强调了政治合作的可能性,即使团队组建是先前个人和专业关系的产物。有一系列因素会影响协作团队的成功,而大学部门中越来越高的绩效要求和期望会进一步加剧这种情况。作为回应,大学学者寻求合作机会,以提高研究生产力并建立能够吸引竞争性赠款资金的网络。然而,很少有人关注这些经验,研究团队成员的态度和价值观,尤其是那些承担领导责任的人。使用希区柯克(火车上的陌生人 [电影],华纳兄弟,好莱坞,1951 年)的黑色电影《火车上的陌生人》的前提作为隐喻装置,使用叙事方法调查了三个协作团队。叙事叙述借鉴了作者对他们参与团队的反思,这些反思融合在一个富有想象力的小插曲中,以确定导致团队成功或消亡的关键因素。调查结果揭示了已建立的关系、清晰的愿景和沟通以及机构奖励的重要性。华纳兄弟,好莱坞,1951 年)将黑色电影《火车上的陌生人》作为隐喻装置,使用叙事方法对三个协作团队进行了调查。叙事叙述借鉴了作者对他们参与团队的反思,这些反思融合在一个富有想象力的小插曲中,以确定导致团队成功或消亡的关键因素。调查结果揭示了已建立的关系、清晰的愿景和沟通以及机构奖励的重要性。华纳兄弟,好莱坞,1951 年)将黑色电影《火车上的陌生人》作为隐喻装置,使用叙事方法对三个协作团队进行了调查。叙事叙述借鉴了作者对他们参与团队的反思,这些反思融合在一个富有想象力的小插曲中,以确定导致团队成功或消亡的关键因素。调查结果揭示了已建立的关系、清晰的愿景和沟通以及机构奖励的重要性。叙事叙述借鉴了作者对他们参与团队的反思,这些反思融合在一个富有想象力的小插曲中,以确定导致团队成功或消亡的关键因素。调查结果揭示了已建立的关系、清晰的愿景和沟通以及机构奖励的重要性。叙事叙述借鉴了作者对他们参与团队的反思,这些反思融合在一个富有想象力的小插曲中,以确定导致团队成功或消亡的关键因素。调查结果揭示了已建立的关系、清晰的愿景和沟通以及机构奖励的重要性。
更新日期:2020-04-01
down
wechat
bug