Here we reconsider teachers’ changing subjectivities as autonomous agents whose practices acknowledge risk as an essential element in intellectual inquiry. We seek alternative descriptions to the limiting language of teachers’ current practices within the primacy of the market. We are convinced by Levinas’s claim that ethics is the first philosophy with its concomitant responsibility for the Other (Alterity). This provides a valuable point of departure and our understanding of its relevance is expanded by Biesta and Todd. This perspective allows interruption of the global reform ensemble with its reductionist understandings of teachers’ subjectivities within concerns for a ‘visible pedagogy’ and performativity. We illustrate how this global policy imperative is reworked in policies in the Republic of Ireland and share reflexive insights from our tutoring of teachers studying for a Master’s degree in Education. We show that teachers’ autonomy, which we understand as the capacity of teachers to facilitate risk and make ethically informed local judgements, is severely restricted by imposed standards, codes and laws to which there is tightly policed adherence. Instead we describe teachers’ practices occurring within an Invisible Pedagogy, which is not concerned with totalising and limited performativity but instead, explores risks associated with existential possibilities beyond commodification.

中文翻译：

---

教师变化的主体性：为市场原则还是为风险化而工作？

在这里，我们重新考虑教师作为自主代理的不断变化的主体性，他们的实践承认风险是知识探究的基本要素。我们在市场主导地位下寻求对教师当前实践的限制性语言的替代描述。我们相信列维纳斯 (Levinas) 的主张，即伦理是第一个哲学，同时伴随着对他者（Alterity）的责任。这提供了一个有价值的出发点，Biesta 和 Todd 扩展了我们对其相关性的理解。这种观点允许中断全球改革整体，其对教师主体性的简化理解是为了“可见的教学法”和表演性。我们说明了这项全球政策要务如何在爱尔兰共和国的政策中重新制定，并分享我们对攻读教育硕士学位的教师的辅导的反思性见解。我们表明教师的自主权，我们理解为教师促进风险和做出符合道德的地方判断的能力，受到严格遵守的强加标准、规范和法律的严重限制。相反，我们描述了在无形教学法中发生的教师实践，它不关心总体和有限的表演性，而是探索与商品化之外的存在可能性相关的风险。我们将其理解为教师促进风险和做出符合道德的当地判断的能力，受到严格遵守的强加标准、规范和法律的严格限制。相反，我们描述了在无形教学法中发生的教师实践，它不关心总体和有限的表演性，而是探索与商品化之外的存在可能性相关的风险。我们将其理解为教师促进风险和做出符合道德的当地判断的能力，受到严格遵守的强加标准、规范和法律的严格限制。相反，我们描述了在无形教学法中发生的教师实践，它不关心总体和有限的表演性，而是探索与商品化之外的存在可能性相关的风险。