当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soc. Choice Welfare › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Power in the Council of the EU: organizing theory, a new index, and Brexit
Social Choice and Welfare ( IF 0.874 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-24 , DOI: 10.1007/s00355-020-01273-z
Philip D. Grech

We aim to estimate the power distribution in the Council of the European Union—both a priori and a posteriori. With respect to the latter, our analysis suggests that several previously used indices are ill-suited for this application. By introducing minimal modifications, we propose a new index and compare it with previous constructions in a unified framework. Empirically, we find that that all countries gain a priori voting power in the Council as a result of Brexit. We rely on data from the Chapel Hill Expert survey to compute a posteriori power and find that it is more unequally distributed than a priori power. Specifically, a posteriori power is almost exclusively held by relatively few rather populous states (yet not the United Kingdom). As regards Brexit, France appears as the main benefactor in terms of gaining a posteriori power; Poland loses substantive power in several areas but remains one of the most powerful EU member states.



中文翻译:

欧盟理事会中的权力:组织理论,新指标和英国脱欧

我们旨在估算先验和后验的欧洲联盟理事会权力分布。关于后者,我们的分析表明,一些以前使用的索引不适用于此应用程序。通过引入最少的修改,我们提出了一个新的索引,并将其与统一框架中的先前结构进行比较。根据经验,我们发现,由于英国退欧,所有国家都在安理会获得了先验投票权。我们依赖于Chapel Hill专家调查的数据来计算后验能力,发现它比先验能力更不均匀地分布。具体而言,后验力量几乎完全由相对少数人口众多的州(但不是英国)拥有。关于英国脱欧,就获得后方力量而言,法国似乎是主要的恩人。

更新日期:2020-08-24
down
wechat
bug