As health care delivery moves toward more complex, team-based systems, the topic of medical teamwork has gained considerable attention and study across disciplines. This systematic review integrates empirical research on teamwork and health care to identify broad trends. We identified and coded 1,818 relevant, English, and peer-reviewed journal articles using a teamwork processes rubric. Several themes emerged. The health care teamwork literature has grown substantially over the past 20 years. Approximately half of the studies were descriptive (rather than interventional or psychometric); the majority relied on quantitative methods. Health care teamwork was also studied in thematically distinct manners. Interpersonal processes were most commonly studied across fields. Of all disciplines, medicine focused most on transition processes, whereas those from team science centered more highly on action processes. There were also finer grained disciplinary differences in content areas of communication and collaboration. Interprofessional journals represent a potential area for interdisciplinary efforts. Implications and future directions are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

跨学科护理：对医疗保健团队合作过程的系统评价

随着医疗保健服务向更复杂的、基于团队的系统发展，医疗团队合作的主题已经引起了跨学科的广泛关注和研究。这篇系统评价整合了关于团队合作和医疗保健的实证研究，以确定广泛的趋势。我们使用团队合作流程准则确定并编码了 1,818 篇相关的、英语和同行评审的期刊文章。出现了几个主题。在过去的 20 年中，医疗团队合作的文献大幅增长。大约一半的研究是描述性的（而不是介入性或心理测量）；大多数依靠定量方法。还以主题不同的方式研究了医疗团队合作。人际交往过程最常被跨领域研究。在所有学科中，医学最关注过渡过程，而来自团队科学的人则更注重行动过程。在沟通和协作的内容领域也存在更细粒度的学科差异。跨专业期刊代表了跨学科努力的潜在领域。讨论了影响和未来的方向。