Feeding disorders exhibited by children with developmental disabilities, which include limiting food intake or refusing to consume solid foods, often result in poor health consequences. Interventions for feeding disorders vary in terms of their acceptability to children with disabilities and their families. One specific procedure, the high-probability sequence, is a nonrestrictive approach where requests with which a child has a history of compliance are presented prior to requests associated with noncompliance. This article reviewed research concerning the application of high-probability sequencing for feeding disorders among children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. Experimental studies published between 1970 and 2018 in English as either peer-reviewed articles or dissertations were eligible for descriptive review. Identified articles (N = 15) evaluated high-probability sequencing using various single-case experimental designs. Participants (N = 21) were generally preschool-aged children (mean age = 5.7 years) diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD; n = 9) or other developmental disabilities (n = 12). Subsequent analysis of articles that met quality indicators of the What Works Clearinghouse (n = 12) suggests that research does not support the effectiveness of the procedure for increasing food acceptance. Implications for practice and future studies involving high-probability sequencing follow a discussion of findings.

中文翻译：

---

使用高概率测序解决发育障碍儿童和青少年的喂养障碍

发育障碍儿童表现出的喂养障碍，包括限制食物摄入或拒绝食用固体食物，通常会导致不良的健康后果。喂养障碍的干预措施在残疾儿童及其家庭的可接受性方面有所不同。一个特定的程序，即高概率序列，是一种非限制性方法，在这种方法中，在与不遵守相关的请求之前提出儿童有遵守历史的请求。本文回顾了高概率测序应用于发育障碍儿童和青少年喂养障碍的研究。1970 年至 2018 年间以英文发表的实验研究，无论是同行评审的文章还是论文，都符合描述性评审的条件。已确定的文章 (N = 15) 使用各种单案例实验设计评估了高概率测序。参与者（N = 21）通常是被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍（ASD；n = 9）或其他发育障碍（n = 12）的学龄前儿童（平均年龄 = 5.7 岁）。随后对符合 What Works Clearinghouse（n = 12）质量指标的文章进行的分析表明，研究不支持提高食品接受度的程序的有效性。对涉及高概率测序的实践和未来研究的影响遵循对发现的讨论。n = 9) 或其他发育障碍 (n = 12)。随后对符合 What Works Clearinghouse（n = 12）质量指标的文章进行的分析表明，研究不支持提高食品接受度的程序的有效性。对涉及高概率测序的实践和未来研究的影响遵循对发现的讨论。n = 9) 或其他发育障碍 (n = 12)。随后对符合 What Works Clearinghouse（n = 12）质量指标的文章的分析表明，研究不支持提高食品接受度的程序的有效性。对涉及高概率测序的实践和未来研究的影响遵循对发现的讨论。