ABSTRACT

Michael Hand argues in his article ‘Against autonomy as an educational aim’ that the project of erecting autonomy as an educational aim is wrongheaded. I argue that his argument fails. I discuss two lines of his argument that deal with different senses of autonomy. The first line of argument trades on an ambiguity. As soon as we disambiguate, we can see that this argument is not cogent. The second misconstrues the point of the concept of autonomy Hand discusses in this line of argument.

中文翻译：

---

反对迈克尔·汉德的反对自治作为教育目标

摘要

迈克尔·汉德（Michael Hand）在他的文章《反对将自主性作为教育目标》中指出，建立自主性作为教育目标的计划是错误的。我认为他的论点失败了。我讨论了他的论点的两行，涉及不同的自治感。论据的第一行有歧义。一旦我们消除歧义，我们就可以看到这种论点是没有说服力的。第二个错误解释了“自治”概念的要点。