One would expect the fields of ‘law and economics’ and ‘remedies’ to have substantial interaction. But scholars in each field largely ignore those in the other. Thus law and economics scholars blunder in their description of the law of remedies, and remedies scholars are cut off from economic insights. For scholars who are in these fields, this article offers a critique, as well as suggestions for cooperation. For all legal scholars interested in melding conceptual and economic analysis, it offers a cautionary tale of disciplinary fragmentation.

中文翻译：

---

补救措施，符合经济学；经济学，满足补救措施

人们会期望“法律和经济学”和“救济”领域有实质性的互动。但是每个领域的学者在很大程度上都忽略了其他领域的学者。因此，法经济学者在对救济法的描述上犯了错误，而救济学者则被切断了经济洞察力。对于这些领域的学者，本文提供了批评和合作建议。对于所有对融合概念和经济分析感兴趣的法律学者来说，它提供了一个关于学科分裂的警示故事。