As part of a long-term project investigating the relevance of phenomenology for (cognitive) linguistics we analyse two central, interrelated concepts:embodied intersubjectivity(intercorporeality) andsedimentation. With respect to the first, we spell out a number of different intercorporeal structures, emanating at the most fundamental level from the dualLeibkörpernature of the body. Further, we demonstrate that sedimentation is more than a ‘geological metaphor’ as meaning is intrinsically layered in human experience. This is first illustrated by reviewing evidence from ontogenetic semiotic development within the framework of the Mimesis Hierarchy model (Zlatev 2013). Then, we focus on the linguistic construal of situations lacking actual motion in dynamic terms through expressions of non-actual motion such asThe road goes through the forestandHe was uplifted by her smile. We review studies of non-actual motion in Swedish, English, French, Bulgarian and Thai extending and re-formulating previous analyses. We argue that the present analysis is more adequate than cognitive linguistic explanations in terms of ‘mental simulation’ and ‘conceptual metaphor’. We conclude by pointing out how our phenomenological investigation can help resolve a number of classical dilemmas in semantics: Is language primarily grounded in the body or in society? Is the ontology of linguistic meaning mental or social? What is the relationship between pre-linguistic experiences and linguistic conventions?

中文翻译：

---

具身的主体间性、沉淀和非实际的运动表达

作为调查现象学与（认知）语言学相关性的长期项目的一部分，我们分析了两个相互关联的核心概念：体现主体间性（实体性）和沉降. 关于第一个，我们阐明了许多不同的体内结构，在最基本的层面上来自双重莱布克尔珀身体的性质。此外，我们证明沉积不仅仅是一种“地质隐喻”，因为意义本质上是分层的人类经验。这首先通过在模仿层次模型（Zlatev 2013）框架内审查个体发生符号学发展的证据来说明。然后，我们通过非实际运动的表达，专注于动态术语中缺乏实际运动的情况的语言解释，例如路穿过森林和他被她的笑容打动了. 我们回顾了瑞典语、英语、法语、保加利亚语和泰语中非实际运动的研究，扩展和重新制定了先前的分析。我们认为，目前的分析在“心理模拟”和“概念隐喻”方面比认知语言解释更充分。最后，我们指出我们的现象学研究如何帮助解决语义学中的一些经典困境：语言主要植根于身体还是社会？语言意义的本体论是心理的还是社会的？前语言经验和语言惯例之间有什么关系？