I document a scope freezing effect found with negated quantifier phrases (distinct from the scope freezing effect discussed in Collins (Nat Lang Semant 24: 291–303, 2016a)). In a sentence with a negated quantifier phrase of the form [NEG DP₁], no quantifier phrase DP₂ can take scope between NEG and DP₁. I show how this scope freezing effect can be explained in terms of the analysis of negated quantifier phrases given in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014) and Collins (2016a).

中文翻译：

---

否定量词短语的范围冻结效果

我记录了用否定的量词短语发现的范围冻结效应（与Collins中讨论的范围冻结效应不同（Nat Lang Semant 24：291–303，2016a））。在带有否定量词短语的形式为[NEG DP ₁ ]的句子中，没有量词短语DP ₂可以在NEG和DP ₁之间占据范围。我展示了如何通过分析柯林斯和邮政（经典NEG提出，麻省理工学院出版社，剑桥，2014年）和柯林斯（2016a）中给出的否定量词短语来解释这种范围冻结效应。