This paper investigates how regular pronominal typology interfaces with de se and de re interpretations, and highlights a correlation between strong pronouns (descriptively speaking) and de re interpretations, and weak pronouns and de se interpretations. In order to illustrate this correlation, I contrast different pronominal forms within a single language, null versus overt pronouns in Kutchi Gujarati, and clitic versus full pronouns in Austrian Bavarian. I argue that the data presented here provide cross-linguistic comparative support for the idea of a dedicated de se LF as argued for by Percus and Sauerland.

中文翻译：

---

代词类型学和 de se/de re 区别

本文研究了常规代词类型学如何与 de se 和 de re 解释相结合，并强调了强代词（从描述上讲）和 de re 解释以及弱代词和 de se 解释之间的相关性。为了说明这种相关性，我比较了单一语言中的不同代词形式，即库奇古吉拉特语中的空代词与明显代词，以及奥地利巴伐利亚语中的阴蒂代词与完整代词。我认为这里提供的数据为 Percus 和 Sauerland 所主张的专用 de se LF 的想法提供了跨语言的比较支持。