In this article, I claim that, while placing his theory of language, language planning, and standardization within a conceptual and historical framework inspired by Modernity, the emergence of the nation-state and liberal democracy, Haugen carefully mapped sociolinguistic phenomena onto their political treatment. And it was this careful and honest cartography—unafraid of generating internal tensions—that revealed aspects of language planning practice and scholarship in need of a critical treatment. Ultimately, Haugen embraced an understanding of linguistics that revolves around normativity and accepts language’s fundamentally political nature.

中文翻译：

---

语言规划及其不满：豪根标准化政治观中的逃亡路线

在这篇文章中，我声称，在将他的语言、语言规划和标准化理论置于受现代性、民族国家和自由民主的出现启发的概念和历史框架内时，豪根仔细地将社会语言现象映射到他们的政治待遇上. 正是这种谨慎而诚实的制图——不怕产生内部紧张——揭示了语言规划实践和学术研究需要批判性处理的方面。最终，豪根接受了围绕规范性的语言学理解，并接受了语言的根本政治性质。