The paper discusses implementation and acceptance as crucial elements of a historical-sociolinguistic reappraisal of Haugen’s well-known theory of standardization. The case study that we focus on is the Dutch language in the second half of the eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth century. In this period, Dutch became an object of political control. Significant aspects of the nationalization of language were the establishment of an officialized orthography (1804) and grammar (1805), which were to be used in the national school system. Education was the societal domain in which the national government tried to secure the transmission of the national language norms. We study the implementation and acceptance of official language norms from two perspectives, viz. by focusing on teaching materials developed for the new national school system, and by analyzing a recently compiled corpus of original language data from this period. We argue that implementation and acceptance, though relatively understudied topics in standardization studies, can usefully be operationalized, and turned into empirical questions that historical-sociolinguistic analysis can answer.

中文翻译：

---

国家语言政策的实施和接受：荷兰语案例（1750-1850）

本文讨论了作为对豪根著名的标准化理论进行历史社会语言学重新评估的关键要素的实施和接受。我们关注的案例研究是 18 世纪下半叶和 19 世纪上半叶的荷兰语。在这一时期，荷兰成为政治控制的对象。语言民族化的重要方面是建立了正式的正字法（1804 年）和语法（1805 年），它们将在国家学校系统中使用。教育是国家政府试图确保国家语言规范传播的社会领域。我们从两个角度研究官方语言规范的实施和接受。通过专注于为新的国家学校系统开发的教材，并通过分析最近编译的这一时期原始语言数据的语料库。我们认为，实施和接受虽然在标准化研究中研究相对较少，但可以有效地进行操作，并转化为历史社会语言学分析可以回答的实证问题。