Richard Daft’s (1995) now classic chapter from Cummings and Frost’s edited volume, Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, titled “Why I Recommended That Your Manuscript Be Rejected and What You Can Do About It?” highlights the many reasons initial manuscripts are rejected. Daft presented the results of a content analysis he conducted on 111 manuscripts reviewed for Administrative Science Quarterly and the Academy of Management Journal to identify common manuscript problems. Following his lead, this manuscript includes a content analysis of manuscripts returned after a revise and resubmit decision granted by Group & Organization Management (GOM) and ultimately issued reject decisions. In effect, this manuscript, as part of the dialog on the revise and resubmit process, details “worst practices” that authors commit when returning a revision.

中文翻译：

---

R&R 对话：为什么我拒绝了你的 R&R 提交以及你可以做些什么来确保接受

理查德·达夫特 (Richard Daft) (1995) 现在是 Cummings 和 Frost 编辑的卷《组织科学出版》中的经典章节，标题为“为什么我建议拒绝你的手稿以及你能做些什么？” 强调了最初的手稿被拒绝的许多原因。达夫特介绍了他对行政科学季刊和管理学会期刊审阅的 111 份手稿进行的内容分析结果，以找出常见的手稿问题。在他的带领下，这份手稿包括对在集团和组织管理 (GOM) 批准修改和重新提交决定后返回的手稿进行内容分析，并最终发布拒绝决定。实际上，作为修改和重新提交过程对话的一部分，这份手稿详细说明了作者在返回修订时所犯的“最坏做法”。