This article utilizes a novel framework to analyse the contested boundaries between law and medicine. Bringing theoretical and empirical insights together, it expands recent socio‐legal scholarship on jurisdiction. Jurisdictional analysis is conducted in an under‐researched area of health law – namely, the accessibility of trans‐related health care. The article draws upon the first qualitative research project to assess the impact of self‐declaration of legal gender status in Denmark. This was adopted in 2014, at the same time as access to hormones and surgeries was centralized and restricted. The combined impact of these reforms disappointed the trans people interviewed, which demonstrates the importance of identifying how legal and medical norms interrelate. Jurisdictional analysis helps to illuminate how law was used to develop and protect professional competencies. Such insights will be valuable for researchers interested in the potential of self‐declaration, and for scholars of health law and socio‐legal studies more generally.

中文翻译：

---

跨健康管辖权

本文利用一个新颖的框架来分析法律与医学之间存在争议的边界。将理论和实证见解结合在一起，扩大了最近关于管辖权的社会法律奖学金。管辖权分析是在卫生法律研究不足的领域进行的，即跨性别医疗保健的可及性。本文借鉴了第一个定性研究项目，以评估自我宣告合法性别身份在丹麦的影响。这是在2014年采用的，与此同时，对激素和手术的获取受到了集中和限制。这些改革的综合影响使受访的跨性别者感到失望，这表明确定法律和医学规范如何相互关联的重要性。管辖权分析有助于阐明如何使用法律发展和保护职业能力。这些见解对于对自我声明潜力感兴趣的研究人员，以及更广泛地对健康法和社会法律研究的学者而言，将是宝贵的。