This study examines how language used by advice recipients and whether the peer apologized before offering advice affected advice outcomes. Participants wrote about a problem and then shared the problem through online chat with a peer (who was actually an experimental confederate). Although the participant was expecting the peer to share a problem as well and stated they did not want advice, the peer gave advice. Use of future tense verbs by the recipient in problem descriptions reduced implementation intention, perceived efficacy of advice, perceived approbation of advice, and perception of advice as confirming. This supports research that planning, operationalized through use of future tense verbs, reduces receptiveness to advice. Participants who used more I and we pronouns had lower intentions to implement advice. Contrary to hypotheses, use of apologies by the advisor for giving unwanted advice did not affect implementation intentions and increased reported negative emotions.

中文翻译：

---

语言对强加建议结果的影响

这项研究调查了建议接受者如何使用语言以及同伴在提供建议之前是否道歉会影响建议结果。参与者写下一个问题，然后通过在线聊天与同行（实际上是一个实验伙伴）分享这个问题。尽管参与者希望同伴也分享一个问题并表示他们不需要建议，但同伴还是提供了建议。接受者在问题描述中使用将来时动词会降低实施意图、感知建议的有效性、感知建议的认可以及将建议视为确认的感知。这支持通过使用将来时态动词来实施计划，减少对建议的接受度的研究。使用更多 I 和我们代词的参与者实施建议的意愿较低。与假设相反，