Abstract This paper looks at how phrases are conceptualized in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) research and practice. It presents examples of phrases identified in academic discourse by EAP researchers, and compares these with examples of the phrases taught in EAP writing course books. The paper highlights the ways in which the forms and functions of phrases recommended for teaching by EAP researchers are different from the forms and functions recommended for teaching in EAP writing materials. This paper illustrates this apparent divergence between EAP research and practice through reviewing the concept of ‘function’ as applied to phrases in both academic discourse research and EAP pedagogy. It then compares the forms and functions categories for six sets of phrases: two produced by researchers and intended for pedagogy, and four found in teaching materials. The paper suggests that, in this area of EAP at least, Halliday’s work is more directly influential on current research than on current practice, and that EAP phraseology is one area where the growing gap between EAP research and practice can in future be quantified.

中文翻译：

---

EAP 学术写作教学法中的短语：阐明韩礼德对研究和实践的影响

摘要 本文着眼于如何在学术英语 (EAP) 研究和实践中概念化短语。它提供了 EAP 研究人员在学术话语中识别出的短语示例，并将这些示例与 EAP 写作课本中教授的短语示例进行了比较。本文重点介绍了EAP研究人员推荐用于教学的短语形式和功能与EAP写作材料中推荐用于教学的形式和功能的不同之处。本文通过回顾应用于学术话语研究和 EAP 教学法中的短语的“功能”概念，说明了 EAP 研究和实践之间的这种明显分歧。然后比较六组短语的形式和功能类别：两组由研究人员制作并用于教学，四是在教材中发现的。该论文表明，至少在 EAP 的这一领域，韩礼德的工作对当前研究的直接影响比对当前实践的影响更大，而且 EAP 用语是未来可以量化 EAP 研究与实践之间日益扩大的差距的一个领域。