The study reports the treatment integrity and acceptability of Check & Connect (C&C), after implementation by 234 adult mentors with 341 students with social, emotional, and behavioral problems. To address the gaps in the treatment acceptability literature, the study further explored (a) the relation between treatment integrity and treatment acceptability of C&C and (b) the predicted effects of variables investigated in the analog studies on mentors’ treatment acceptability ratings. Overall, mentors implemented C&C with high integrity perceived as an acceptable intervention. Regression analyses showed that mentors who perceived C&C as acceptable implemented it with significantly greater integrity than mentors with lower acceptability ratings. Dosage as well as student and mentor characteristics did not predict mentors’ treatment acceptability ratings. Implications for practice and research are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

Check & Connect 处理完整性和可接受性的评估

该研究报告了 Check & Connect (C&C) 的治疗完整性和可接受性，在 234 名成人导师与 341 名有社交、情感和行为问题的学生实施后。为了解决治疗可接受性文献中的空白，该研究进一步探讨了 (a) C&C 治疗完整性和治疗可接受性之间的关系，以及 (b) 模拟研究中调查的变量对导师治疗可接受性评级的预测影响。总体而言，导师以高度诚信的方式实施了 C&C，被认为是一种可接受的干预措施。回归分析表明，认为 C&C 可接受的导师比可接受性评级较低的导师更诚实地实施它。剂量以及学生和导师的特征并不能预测导师的治疗可接受性评级。讨论了对实践和研究的影响。