ABSTRACT

Oppression actions in Singapore have been the subject of empirical research in light of the possibility that the use of ‘commercial unfairness’ as the test for oppression in Singapore has favoured plaintiffs to the extent that businesses have been damaged by successful or even unsuccessful oppression suits. The findings, however, only prove that the complexity of oppression actions has increased. Consideration should still be given to whether some form of contractarianism ought to guide this area of law.

中文翻译：

---

对新加坡压迫行动后果的实证研究

摘要

鉴于使用“商业不公平”作为对新加坡压迫的检验可能会有利于原告，以至企业因成功甚至失败的压迫诉讼而受到损害，新加坡的压迫行动一直是经验研究的主题。然而，这些发现仅证明压迫行动的复杂性有所增加。仍应考虑某种形式的契约主义是否应指导这一法律领域。